Texas

2006 figures are not yet available.
2005 - 11 deaths related to abuse or
neglect. Three were caused by foster
caregivers.
2004 - 15 deaths related to abuse or
neglect. Four were caused by foster
caregivers.
2003 - Six deaths related to abuse or
neglect. Three were caused by foster
caregivers.
Texas

Arizona

Governor's policies put state's kids at risk

Laura Knaperek
My Turn
Aug. 29, 2005 12:00 AM

As a member of the Joint Legislative
Committee on Children and Families,I am
appalled at how the state is "protecting"
children from harm and neglect, and how
the watchdogs of children have turned
away from the brutal truth.

From testimony heard by the committee
over the past three months, it is clear
that the same system that is authorized
to stop abuse seems to be one of the
worst abusers.

When Gov. Janet Napolitano started
yanking kids out of their homes into
government-funded and regulated
institutions at the beginning of her
administration, the situation for kids in
Arizona became worse than ever.

Nearly 10,000 children have been taken
from their homes, with about 6,500 in
foster homes and another 1,500 in a
group-home setting. Amazingly, 280 are
suspected runaways, children taken from
bad homes and put into situations that
caused them to flee

Between April 2004 and March 2005, 13
children under state care died. Six of
those children hadn't reached their first
birthday.



The governor declared her top priority
would be the safety of children. That is
what all of us want. Unfortunately, for
10,000 children and their families, the
governor falsely equates child safety with
child removal.

Richard Wexler, a former investigative
reporter and director of the National
Center on Child Welfare Reform, and a
few other voices, including mine, have
warned what the outcome of "safety" vs.
"reunite" would mean for kids.

Data prove that the best way to keep
most children safe is to provide the help
needed to keep families together.

Removing children from their homes can
be detrimental. Children in foster homes
are three times more likely to be
physically abused. The rate is 10 times
higher in group homes. Children in group
homes are 28 percent more likely than
children in the general populace to
experience sexual abuse.

Why is the state taking that kind of risk?
Are those kids really better off now?

Keep in mind, 13 children in one year
died while under state care; Arizona's
rate of removing children from their
homes is twice the national average; and
280 children have run away from the
state's care.

In the 2003 CPS special legislative
session, the debate revolved around
whether more children should be
removed from their homes.

A CPS caseworker said in a Valley
paper, "(Caseworkers) are scared to
death to make a mistake, and you're
going to see more kids removed
because of that."

No wonder there is a desperate plea for
foster homes. The additional money,
caseworkers and removals have not
fixed the problem. The real fix is
preventive services in the homes of
families.

I have only talked about the raw
numbers. The real-life stories are in the
legislative hearings that have been
taking place all summer through the Joint
Legislative Committee on Children and
Families. The next meeting is at 9:30
a.m. Tuesday in House Hearing Room 4,
1700 W. Washington St., Phoenix.

Now it is time for the media to look at the
same numbers and, more importantly,
talk to the real people behind these
frightening figures.

Do not be lulled into believing no news is
good news. Arizona's children are not
safe.

Laura Knaperek, a Tempe Republican, is
a state representative who serves on the
Joint Legislative Committee on Children
and Families.
Arizona


Response to Rep. Laura Knaperek
Information on Children Who Left CPS
Care for Reason "Death of Child" —
04/01/04-03/30/05  
Age at time of death  Cause of death  
Where child was at time of death
(where the 13 children over the last year
have died)  
2 months  Autopsy information received
by CPS indicates child died of SIDS
Infant was born substance exposed.
Foster home  
2 years  Medical complications following
heart surgery. Child was born with
multiple significant health problems
including heart defect.  Hospital
(Child was in the custody of a relative)

7 years  Medical complications following
skin graft.  Relative Placement  
17 years  Suicide.  Therapeutic Group
home  
6 weeks  Autopsy information received by
CPS indicates child died of SIDS
Infant was born substance exposed.
Unlicensed non relative placement  
5 years  Accidental drowning.  DDD
licensed respite home.  
7 weeks  Medical complications. Child
died during surgery to correct heart
defect.  Hospital
(Child was living in a relative placement)

7 months  Autopsy information received
by CPS indicates child died of SIDS.
Infant was born substance exposed.
Day Care provider
(Infant was living in a foster home
placement)

13 years  Complications of Sickle Cell
anemia.  Foster home  
14 years  Accident. Child was opening a
plastic container with a pair of scissors
and pushed the scissors through the
package into his chest, damaging his
heart.  Foster home  
5 years  Injuries sustained from dog
attack.  Child was on a visit in her
biological parents' home when incident
occurred.
(Child was living in a foster home
placement)

2 months  Medical complications following
surgery for heart defect.
Infant was born substance exposed.
Foster home  
18 days  Autopsy information received by
CPS indicates child died of SIDS.
Infant was born substance exposed.
Foster home  

From the response, it appears that
elected representatives in Arizona have
as much trouble getting the names of
children in care as those outside of
government. According to the Arizona
Department of Economic Security,
Division of Children, Youth and Families:

In Arizona as of September 30, 2004
there were 8,839 children who were
placed in out-of-home care due to abuse,
neglect or abandonment.

The thirteen reported deaths in a year
give a rate of 147 per hundred thousand
child years.

California


Almost 50 abused or neglected California
children died last year in foster care after
the state took them away from their parents
for their own protection, according to child
advocates who started counting because
the state does not keep track.

The tally by the Children's Advocacy
Institute is the first measurement of how
many of California's most vulnerable
children die while under the state's
guardianship.

The institute, based at the University of
San Diego School of Law, also found that
more than 60 children in foster care died in
2004. California has about 75,000 foster
children, one-fourth of the nation's foster-
care population.

Some of the children died accidentally or of
natural causes. But others were neglected
or abused by caregivers. The causes of
death were not included in the study.

The death count includes children such as
Dylan James George, 2, whose foster
parents have been charged with fatally
beating him in their Fremont home in 2004.
Anthony Cortez, 15, was choked to death
by another child in a Stockton group home
in 2003. Four-month-old Christopher Battie
died of sudden infant death syndrome in a
Fresno foster home in 2003.

Data comparing the death rate for children
in foster care to the death rate for children
overall were not available because the
state has not compiled updated mortality
statistics for the general population.

The California Department of Social
Services collects data on how many
children in foster care statewide are
injured, but not on how many die.

Advocates said a failure to monitor deaths
in foster care could hamper efforts to
improve the system. The state failed a
federal review three years ago in part
because children were not being kept safe
enough after being removed from their
homes.

"It just makes common sense that the state
should be tracking and aware of how and
when their children are dying, and if there's
anything they can do to stop that," said
Christina Riehl, an attorney at the
Children's Advocacy Institute.

Riehl said the institute started its count
after a state law went into effect requiring
counties to release the name and date of
death of each child who dies while in foster
care. The group compiled the data by
submitting requests to each of California's
58 counties.

Mary Ault, California's deputy director of
children and family services, said the state
reviews individual death reports and has
monitored fatality trends through the Child
Death Review Council.

"I believe the more facts we have, the more
information we have, the better we're able
to manage for better outcomes," Ault said.

The review council, composed of
representatives from different state
agencies, looks at records of all child
deaths in the state and issues periodic
reports. But there is a lag time of several
years before each report is released, and
the council does not specify how many of
the children who died were in foster care.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services determined last year
that the state was violating federal law by
failing to publicly disclose information about
deaths and near-deaths of children due to
abuse or neglect.

Threatened with the loss of federal child-
welfare funds, the state this summer
started requiring counties to file reports on
such incidents. The reports are supposed
to be filed on all children, not just those in
foster care.

Ault said the state would be able to use
those reports as a tool for improving the
system.

So far, one report has been filed. It
describes the drowning death of a 2-year-
old girl found in a hot tub in Orange County
in July.

The report said Orange County social
workers had investigated several reports
that the girl's parents had neglected her
and had placed her with her grandparents
for several months while both parents were
incarcerated. When the girl died, she was
back in her parents' custody.

Meanwhile, the state is continuing efforts to
reduce the number of children in foster
care, which has dropped since a high of
100,000 in 2000.

In a couple of weeks, the Bush
administration will begin allowing California
to spend federal foster-care funds on
programs that aim to keep children at
home with their parents.

The rate at which California removes
children from their homes is close to the
nationwide average, said Richard Wexler,
director of the National Coalition for Child
Protection Reform. But Wexler believes the
rate should still be lower.

"What you have in foster care is a system
where, of course, the majority of foster
parents want to do the best that they can
for the children in their care," Wexler said.
"But the abusive minority is significant, and
there are a number of foster children
abusing each other. The system is
overloaded with children who don't need to
be there."

FAST FACTS

California has about 75,000 foster children,
one-fourth of the nation's foster-care
population. The study by the Children's
Advocacy Institute found that:

•Almost 50 California children died last
year in foster care.
•More than 60 such children died in 2004.
•The state Department of Social Services
collects data on how many children in
foster care are injured, but not on how
many die.
About the writer:

The Bee's Clea Benson can be reached at
(916) 326-5533 or cbenson@sacbee.com.
Children Who Have Died in Foster Care in California, Texas and Arizona